WHY CHARTTRACE EXISTS
Trust should
have a source.
Healthcare coding and billing teams are too often asked to trust a conclusion before they can see what supports it.
Every code backed
by literal evidence.
A conclusion should have a path back to the words in the chart. That path should be visible to the person responsible for the decision.
THE PROBLEM WE’RE WORKING ON
The conclusion
is only part of the work.
For SNF and revenue cycle teams, review means more than reading a proposed code. It means finding the documentation, understanding the applicable rule and deciding whether the evidence supports the result.
When those pieces are disconnected, the reviewer has to reconstruct the reasoning. ChartTrace is being built to keep them together.
Explore the workspace ↗AI may assist.
Use assistance to find relevant support, with a visible distinction between source evidence and interpretation.
The source stays visible.
Keep the literal statement and its location alongside the conclusion it is being used to support.
Rules answer rule questions.
Use deterministic logic for defined questions. An AI proposal does not override the applicable rule.
Humans remain in control.
Put judgment with qualified reviewers who can investigate, change, approve or reject a recommendation.
The reasoning remains traceable.
Keep the evidence, rule context and important human actions connected to the review.
Evidence you can inspect.
Decisions you can understand.